by Brad » Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:28 pm
Thanks Ben. And Fred, I'll try to remember.
For as long as I've known about Galaxies rotation anomalies and other aspects of the "dark" sector I've felt that a more comprehensive understanding of the nature of spacetime and gravitational fields could be used to explain them. To that end I have engaged myself and others on these groups in order to bring myself to a better understanding. I've always felt that the search for a new exotic type of matter was based only on the the rigid interpretation that gravity induced movement and that gravity was only manifested when matter was present. To me a better idea was to consider a gravitational field as just another configuration of spacetime; and that every volume of spacetime had its own inherent energetic quantities.
But the Universe is expanding! Since bound structures cannot expand that meant the expansion could only be associated with spaces devoid of matter and gravitationally bound structures. The Voids! So, the next step was to ignore the FLRW metric and consider the Universe as having two separate spacetime regimes. The Voids with an expanding spacetime and the matter structures with a stagnant or extremely slowly varying spacetime. So, there must exist an interface between these two disparate regimes. And its physical nature, with its associated effects is, at best, unrecognized.
That boundary is a boundary of two optically different spacetimes, with each having its own distinct metric. That optical difference IMO is the optical effects recognized as galactic halos. And because this is spacetime, the regime of gravitational fields, it must be considered that gravitational effects will also be manifest.
Maybe I'm a handwaving c****pot, until I see Stuart Marongwe with the same idea coming from a different direction.
If we consider this problem from a Lagrangian field aspect then we can say we have two different spacetime fields,(one type coming from all sides) each with its own potential interfacing, with an associated "blister" forming around the bound structure. (see R. Penrose _The Road To Reality_ Pg488 fig20.9 Hamilton's principle for field Lagrangians)
Anyway, that's what I'm working on. And that's why Marongwe's paper was significant enough for me to share.
Thanks
Brad Johnson
Thanks Ben. And Fred, I'll try to remember.
For as long as I've known about Galaxies rotation anomalies and other aspects of the "dark" sector I've felt that a more comprehensive understanding of the nature of spacetime and gravitational fields could be used to explain them. To that end I have engaged myself and others on these groups in order to bring myself to a better understanding. I've always felt that the search for a new exotic type of matter was based only on the the rigid interpretation that gravity induced movement and that gravity was only manifested when matter was present. To me a better idea was to consider a gravitational field as just another configuration of spacetime; and that every volume of spacetime had its own inherent energetic quantities.
But the Universe is expanding! Since bound structures cannot expand that meant the expansion could only be associated with spaces devoid of matter and gravitationally bound structures. The Voids! So, the next step was to ignore the FLRW metric and consider the Universe as having two separate spacetime regimes. The Voids with an expanding spacetime and the matter structures with a stagnant or extremely slowly varying spacetime. So, there must exist an interface between these two disparate regimes. And its physical nature, with its associated effects is, at best, unrecognized.
That boundary is a boundary of two optically different spacetimes, with each having its own distinct metric. That optical difference IMO is the optical effects recognized as galactic halos. And because this is spacetime, the regime of gravitational fields, it must be considered that gravitational effects will also be manifest.
Maybe I'm a handwaving c****pot, until I see Stuart Marongwe with the same idea coming from a different direction.
If we consider this problem from a Lagrangian field aspect then we can say we have two different spacetime fields,(one type coming from all sides) each with its own potential interfacing, with an associated "blister" forming around the bound structure. (see R. Penrose _The Road To Reality_ Pg488 fig20.9 Hamilton's principle for field Lagrangians)
Anyway, that's what I'm working on. And that's why Marongwe's paper was significant enough for me to share.
Thanks
Brad Johnson