Classical optical fields "violate" Bell-CHSH

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are OFF
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Classical optical fields "violate" Bell-CHSH

Re: Classical optical fields "violate" Bell-CHSH

Post by Dirkman » Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:35 am

FrediFizzx wrote:As reported recently in another thread,

Yes, I was the guest who reported it, I'm a layman who has been following for the last couple of months this interesting Bell debate. I also opened a thread about a Bell proof, I hope somebody answers there.

Re: Classical optical fields "violate" Bell-CHSH

Post by Joy Christian » Wed Aug 19, 2015 5:52 pm

FrediFizzx wrote:Are there any flaws in this experiment other than them blaming it on "classical entanglement"? :- )

The authors thank helpful discussion(s) with A. Aspect. If true, that gives them some further credibility (I no longer trust statements from "scientists" without proof).

Classical optical fields "violate" Bell-CHSH

Post by FrediFizzx » Wed Aug 19, 2015 3:25 pm

As reported recently in another thread, the Qian, et al, experiment was finally published in June.
"Shifting the quantum-classical boundary: theory and experiment for statistically classical optical fields"

https://www.osapublishing.org/optica/fu ... &id=321243

arXiv links,

http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01305
http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.3338

Are there any flaws in this experiment other than them blaming it on "classical entanglement"? :- )

Top

CodeCogs - An Open Source Scientific Library