It is quite amazing that the Bell believers can stick to their positions when there is stacking up quite a lot of evidence against Bell's argument. Here is a starting list of such evidence. Perhaps we can add more to it as time goes along.
1. QM itself cannot produce the -cosine curve using the +/-1 outcomes of Bell's argument.
2. It is mathematically impossible for
anything to violate an inequality.
3. There exists a
classical local realistic model that explains the correlations for EPR-Bohm perfectly using a simple common sense postulate.
4.
Classical Optical Fields "violate" Bell-CHSHAnd no +/- 1 outcomes required!!! Of course they use the same trick as other quantum experiments, etc. to show "violation".
Of course the Bell fanatics will try to rationalize this evidence away so that they can hold to their self-brainwashing mode. They will believe their rationalizations to be true in their own minds.
It is quite amazing that the Bell believers can stick to their positions when there is stacking up quite a lot of evidence against Bell's argument. Here is a starting list of such evidence. Perhaps we can add more to it as time goes along.
1. QM itself cannot produce the -cosine curve using the +/-1 outcomes of Bell's argument.
2. It is mathematically impossible for [b]anything[/b] to violate an inequality.
3. There exists a [url=http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.1879]classical local realistic model[/url] that explains the correlations for EPR-Bohm perfectly using a simple common sense postulate.
4. [url=http://www.sciphysicsforums.com/spfbb1/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=191]Classical Optical Fields "violate" Bell-CHSH[/url]
And no +/- 1 outcomes required!!! Of course they use the same trick as other quantum experiments, etc. to show "violation".
Of course the Bell fanatics will try to rationalize this evidence away so that they can hold to their self-brainwashing mode. They will believe their rationalizations to be true in their own minds.
