by jtankersley » Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:48 pm
After much effort the simulation at
https://codeserver.net/bell/2/ now appears to violate Bell's in-equalities using CHSH experiment.
Math is based on Karma Peny's presentation here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOtsEgbg1-sModes are:
Quantum (
simulated 'spooky action at a distance', random 50% detection)
Classic (
local hidden variables, cos²(θ) probability match, |cos(2θ)| probability detection)
Karma Peny (
local hidden variables, cos²(θ) simple match, |cos(2θ)| probability)
The Quantum mode is nothing special (
particles communicate), and achieves an almost perfect 2.8 CHSH score.
But the other 2 modes Classic and Karma Peny are special, the particles have "
local hidden variables" that do not communicate (
each detection knows only properties of 1 particle and 1 detector).
The Classic Model exceeds QM expected values at approximately 2.5.
The Karma Peny model actually far exceeds the QM expected 2.8 with values in the 3+ range.
Simulation at
https://codeserver.net/bell/2Code is available at
https://github.com/tankersley/bell
After much effort the simulation at [url]https://codeserver.net/bell/2/[/url] now appears to violate Bell's in-equalities using CHSH experiment.
Math is based on Karma Peny's presentation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOtsEgbg1-s
Modes are:
[b]Quantum[/b] ([i]simulated 'spooky action at a distance', random 50% detection[/i])
[b]Classic[/b] ([i]local hidden variables, cos²(θ) probability match, |cos(2θ)| probability detection[/i])
[b]Karma Peny[/b] ([i]local hidden variables, cos²(θ) simple match, |cos(2θ)| probability[/i])
The Quantum mode is nothing special ([i]particles communicate[/i]), and achieves an almost perfect 2.8 CHSH score.
But the other 2 modes Classic and Karma Peny are special, the particles have "[i]local hidden variables[/i]" that do not communicate ([i]each detection knows only properties of 1 particle and 1 detector[/i]).
The Classic Model exceeds QM expected values at approximately 2.5.
The Karma Peny model actually far exceeds the QM expected 2.8 with values in the 3+ range.
[img]https://codeserver.net/bell/images/bell_chsh_100.png[/img]
Simulation at https://codeserver.net/bell/2
Code is available at https://github.com/tankersley/bell