by Joy Christian » Fri Apr 02, 2021 1:56 am
.
Hi Fred,
There is a minor problem with your proof. While the statistics behind the strong correlations is finely displayed by your code, it seems to violate the requirement that when a = b, AB = -1.
That is both an experimental requirement and a prediction of quantum mechanics. Moreover, it was used by EPR as one of the prerequisites in their argument that started this debate.
This is a very minor problem for your code. It can be easily fixed by simply changing the sign on your function A or B, by recalling that bivectors square to -1.
.
.
Hi Fred,
There is a minor problem with your proof. While the statistics behind the strong correlations is finely displayed by your code, it seems to violate the requirement that when a = b, AB = -1.
That is both an experimental requirement and a prediction of quantum mechanics. Moreover, it was used by EPR as one of the prerequisites in their argument that started this debate.
This is a very minor problem for your code. It can be easily fixed by simply changing the sign on your function A or B, by recalling that bivectors square to -1.
.