by gill1109 » Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:09 am
minkwe wrote:Anything based on the assumption that Bell's Theorem is correct, will never work.
Dear Michel
I have over the years established various different refinements of Bell's theorem which (I believe) show that networked computer simulation of loophole-free Bell experiments is impossible, without violating locality or free choice of detector settings. I would be interested, Michel, if you could tell me what is wrong with the mathematics (in particular, the probability theory) in my papers. Of course, I use ideas which I learnt from Bell's and others' work. The "Bell game" has a long history. The use of a network computer analogy as a pedagogical device to aid understanding of Bell's theorem has a long history, too.
NB, my question to you is not about physics, it's about computer simulations! Of course, you can just say that you are not interested in computer simulations - but then I wonder why you wrote some beautiful ones, yourself.
2020: Gull's theorem revisited
https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.007192015: Event based simulation of an EPR-B experiment by local hidden variables: epr-simple and epr-clocked
https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.001062012: Statistics, Causality and Bell's Theorem
https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.51032003: Time, Finite Statistics, and Bell's Fifth Position
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/03010592001: Accardi contra Bell (cum mundi): The Impossible Coupling
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0110137[quote="minkwe"]Anything based on the assumption that Bell's Theorem is correct, will never work.[/quote]
Dear Michel
I have over the years established various different refinements of Bell's theorem which (I believe) show that networked computer simulation of loophole-free Bell experiments is impossible, without violating locality or free choice of detector settings. I would be interested, Michel, if you could tell me what is wrong with the mathematics (in particular, the probability theory) in my papers. Of course, I use ideas which I learnt from Bell's and others' work. The "Bell game" has a long history. The use of a network computer analogy as a pedagogical device to aid understanding of Bell's theorem has a long history, too.
NB, my question to you is not about physics, it's about computer simulations! Of course, you can just say that you are not interested in computer simulations - but then I wonder why you wrote some beautiful ones, yourself.
2020: Gull's theorem revisited
https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00719
2015: Event based simulation of an EPR-B experiment by local hidden variables: epr-simple and epr-clocked
https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.00106
2012: Statistics, Causality and Bell's Theorem
https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5103
2003: Time, Finite Statistics, and Bell's Fifth Position
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0301059
2001: Accardi contra Bell (cum mundi): The Impossible Coupling
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0110137
