Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetime

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are OFF
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetime

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Thu Jan 17, 2019 6:56 pm

***
I have updated this paper on the arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2355

In the new version, relativistic treatment of spins is added on page 9 and Tsirel'son's bounds for the model are derived in section VIII.

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Sat Sep 15, 2018 4:57 am

***
I have updated this paper on the arXiv, adding two new sections, including the following remark: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2355

Image
***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:34 pm

***
Just in case anyone has any doubt about my claim that I did indeed receive the galley proofs for the Annals of Physics long time ago, and sent them back the corrected proofs, here is a copy of the actual proofs for all to see: http://libertesphilosophica.info/blog/l ... 3-2-14.pdf. Download the proofs and check them out for yourself.

As of this moment I have not received any communication from Annals of Physics apart from the Acceptance Letter posted above, which I received on the 26th of June.

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Sun Sep 18, 2016 9:55 am

thray wrote:Joy,

Congratulations. Again. ;)

When the history of this sorry affair is written, it will be seen as a great triumph of intellect over politics.

All Best,

Tom

Thanks, Tom.

As yet I am not entirely complacent about this. We face powerful political forces. The more we expose them, the more they will clampdown on the whistle-blowers.

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by thray » Sun Sep 18, 2016 9:23 am

Joy,

Congratulations. Again. ;)

When the history of this sorry affair is written, it will be seen as a great triumph of intellect over politics.

All Best,

Tom

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:21 am

***
Without having to prompt, I have now received the following Status Update from the publisher (Elsevier) of the journal Annals of Physics:

Image

It seems to me that those who are trying to unethically interfere with the publication of my article will have to try harder to block it.

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Sat Sep 10, 2016 8:13 am

***
I should add here that, as repeat-offender as he is, Richard D. Gill is just a henchman of the Bell mafia, foolish enough to put his name on line. The real Godfathers operate behind-the-scenes, hidden behind the veil of anonymity, frequently abusing their political powers to further their ideological causes. Yes, I am talking about physics, not politics. And my comments here are based on my personal experiences over the past nine and a half years --- not all of which are visible on the Internet.

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Sat Sep 03, 2016 5:06 am

***
Mind you, extreme fanaticism of some Bell-believers --- such as Richard D. Gill for example --- has led them to stoop to extremely unethical tactics behind-the-scenes, including compulsive lying, deceitfulness, and even criminal activities like cyber-stalking, cyber-bullying, and lynch-mobbing. Therefore I would not be surprised at all if Richard D. Gill, or his surrogates are trying to unethically interfere with the publication process of my paper. To my mind such tactics only prove that they have been well and truly defeated. If they disagree with this assessment, then they are welcome to take up my challenge to Bell's theorem: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=275#p6681. :)

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Heinera » Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:46 pm

According to the communication, Shahid wrote you could contact him at aop@elsevier.com. That is an option I would explore if I were you.

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:03 pm

***
Following is what shows at this moment on my author page. The acceptance letter I posted above was the last communication I received from AOP on 26/06/16.

Image

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:10 am

Heinera wrote:At least we can agree that if AoP have somehow retracted the paper without informing you, it is not very professional on their side.

Wow! For once I agree with Heinera about something.

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Heinera » Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:07 am

Ok. I just assumed otherwise since you wrote "However, the last communication I received from Annals of Physics was two months ago, and it was the following: ..."

At least we can agree that if AoP have somehow retracted the paper without informing you, it is not very professional on their side.

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Wed Aug 31, 2016 10:03 am

Heinera wrote:You should have recived the proof copy by now, if this was supposed to go to print in the October issue.

I have. So you can stop celebrating.

The proofs were sent by the publisher, Elsevier, not by the journal, Annals of Physics.

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Heinera » Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:54 am

You should have recived the proof copy by now, if this was supposed to go to print in the October issue.

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Wed Aug 31, 2016 6:08 am

***
There are celebrations in some quarters, with a presumption that Annals of Physics has dropped the Hot Potato. :)

However, the last communication I received from Annals of Physics was two months ago, and it was the following:


Subject: AOP 71432R1 accepted .................................................. Sent: Sun 26/06/2016 07:41

Ms. AOP 71432R1
Title: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetime
Corresponding Author: Dr. Joy Christian
Annals of Physics

Dear Dr. Christian:

I am pleased to inform you that the editor has accepted your paper, referenced above for publication.

Please note that your paper will now be sent to the production office for further processing.
If you have any questions during this next stage, please contact me at (aop@elsevier.com).

Thank you for submitting your work to Annals of Physics.

Yours sincerely,

Shahid
Journal Manager
for the Editors, Annals of Physics

Reviewer's comments:

Reviewer #1: In his revision, the author has satisfactorily addressed the concerns which I had raised.
I consider the manuscript suitable for publication in the revised version.

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:46 am

Dirkman wrote:Why was the article removed from Annals of Physics ?

Image

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Dirkman » Tue Aug 30, 2016 5:06 am

Why was the article removed from Annals of Physics ?

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:28 am

***
The full bibliographic details of this paper are now available: Annals of Physics, vol. 373C (October 2016) pp. 67-79.

***

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Sat Jul 09, 2016 1:11 am

***
For your visual delight, here is one of the Geometric Algebra based simulation of the model discussed in the above paper: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=200&p=5550#p5514

FrediFizzx wrote:I have extended Albert Jan's simulation to 9 degree increment resolution. Probably not much point in going further with it since we know the result of Joy's model is -a.b.
Image

Re: Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetim

Post by Joy Christian » Wed Jul 06, 2016 2:38 am

***
I suppose I should provide a brief background to this paper for the uninitiated --- just to explain what the significance is of this paper.

Well, it demonstrates in detail that quantum entanglement is not a fundamental feature of the world, by answering in the affirmative the question famously left open by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) in 1935.

EPR concluded in their famous paper of 1935 that “While we have thus shown that the wave function does not provide a complete description of the physical reality, we left open the question of whether or not such a description exists.” This question is answered in my paper in the affirmative.

***

Top

cron
CodeCogs - An Open Source Scientific Library