by Gordon Watson » Thu May 10, 2018 1:55 pm
Here's a link to several papers re "The BIG Bell Test Collaboration" --
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586- ... UzMjI2MwS2Why this foolishness? I'd welcome your definition of local realism.
PS: AND critiques of my own, which follows --
For me, true local realism [TLR] is the union of true locality and true realism. True locality insists that no influence propagates superluminally, after Einstein. True realism insists that some existents may change interactively, after Bohr: to thereby embrace classical mechanics within quantum mechanics.
Here's a link to several papers re "The BIG Bell Test Collaboration" --
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05073-5?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20180510&utm_source=nature_etoc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20180510&spMailingID=56589675&spUserID=MjA1NjQ3NjI5MAS2&spJobID=1401532263&spReportId=MTQwMTUzMjI2MwS2
Why this foolishness? I'd welcome your definition of local realism.
PS: AND critiques of my own, which follows --
For me, true local realism [TLR] is the union of true locality and true realism. True locality insists that no influence propagates superluminally, after Einstein. True realism insists that some existents may change interactively, after Bohr: to thereby embrace classical mechanics within quantum mechanics.