by Joy Christian » Wed Jul 10, 2019 4:46 am
gill1109 wrote:Joy Christian wrote:
... It is worth noting here that the predictions of my 3-sphere model for the EPR-Bohm correlations are experimentally verified by the so-called "loophole-free violations of Bell-inequalities"...
That is not true. The notable experiments in Delft, Vienna, and at NIST (Boulder, Colorado) in 2015, and the one in Munich in 2016, use different states and furthermore have further distinct features which are not taken account of in your 3-sphere model at all (and each of the four experiments differs from the others, too!).
Fair enough. But my 3-sphere model is just a special case within my 7-sphere model, which reproduces, in principle, the predictions of any given quantum state. Thus whatever states these experiments are observing predictions of, they are covered by my 7-sphere model in principle. Needless to say, I do not have an army of supporters or any financial support from anyone to do the necessary calculations within the 7-sphere model for keeping up with what is going on in the abundantly funded Bell industry. So conformists will always have an upper hand over me.
gill1109 wrote:
The correlations observed in all of those four experiments are completely different from those predicted by your model.
This can't be true, because whatever is predicted by my 3-sphere and 7-sphere models is identical to what is predicted by quantum mechanics, unless, of course, the "loophole-free" experimenters have observed correlations that contradict the predictions of quantum mechanics or go beyond the predictions of quantum mechanics. But I doubt that that is the case.
In any event, Bell's theorem is about the singlet correlations. Bell explicitly claimed that the singlet correlations, E(
a,
b) = -
a.
b, cannot be reproduced by any local-realistic model.
***
[quote="gill1109"][quote="Joy Christian"]
... It is worth noting here that the predictions of my 3-sphere model for the EPR-Bohm correlations are experimentally verified by the so-called "loophole-free violations of Bell-inequalities"...[/quote]
That is not true. The notable experiments in Delft, Vienna, and at NIST (Boulder, Colorado) in 2015, and the one in Munich in 2016, use different states and furthermore have further distinct features which are not taken account of in your 3-sphere model at all (and each of the four experiments differs from the others, too!).[/quote]
Fair enough. But my 3-sphere model is just a special case within my 7-sphere model, which reproduces, in principle, the predictions of any given quantum state. Thus whatever states these experiments are observing predictions of, they are covered by my 7-sphere model in principle. Needless to say, I do not have an army of supporters or any financial support from anyone to do the necessary calculations within the 7-sphere model for keeping up with what is going on in the abundantly funded Bell industry. So conformists will always have an upper hand over me.
[quote="gill1109"]
The correlations observed in all of those four experiments are completely different from those predicted by your model.[/quote]
This can't be true, because whatever is predicted by my 3-sphere and 7-sphere models is identical to what is predicted by quantum mechanics, unless, of course, the "loophole-free" experimenters have observed correlations that contradict the predictions of quantum mechanics or go beyond the predictions of quantum mechanics. But I doubt that that is the case.
In any event, Bell's theorem is about the singlet correlations. Bell explicitly claimed that the singlet correlations, E([b]a[/b],[b] b[/b]) = -[b]a[/b].[b]b[/b], cannot be reproduced by any local-realistic model.
***