***
Prof. Karl Hess has posted a new paper on ResearchGate:
https://www.researchgate.net/project/Re ... 499feb41ac.
Title: Kolmogorov’s probability spaces for “entangled” data-subsets of EPRB experiments: no violation of Einstein’s separation principle
Abstract:
It is demonstrated that the use of Kolmogorov’s probability theory to describe results of quantum probability
for EPRB (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm) experiments requires extreme care when different subsets of measurement
outcomes are considered. J. S. Bell and his followers have committed critical inaccuracies related to
spin-gauge and probability measures of such subsets, because they use exclusively a single probability space for
all data sets and sub-sets of data.
It is also shown that Bell and followers use far too stringent epistemological requirements for the consequences
of space-like separation. Their requirements reach way beyond Einstein’s separation principle and
cannot be met by the major existing physical theories including relativity and even classical mechanics. For
example, the independent free will does not empower the experimenters to choose multiple independent spingauges
in the two EPRB wings.
It is demonstrated that the suggestion of instantaneous influences at a distance (supposedly “derived” from
experiments with entangled quantum entities) is a consequence of said inaccuracies and takes third rank as soon
as the Kolmogorov probability measures are related to a consistent global spin-gauge and permitted to be different
for different data subsets: Using statistical interpretations and different probability spaces for certain subsets
of outcomes instead of probability amplitudes related to single quantum entities, permits physical explanations
without a violation of Einstein’s separation principle.
***