by Gordon Watson » Sat Jul 01, 2017 7:35 pm
NB: At
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=311 I've changed my terminology from CLR (clear local realism) to TLR (true-local-realism).
Thanks to minkwe's fair challenge: I suggest that thread is the place to now discuss the
core component of my theory: TLR:
With its catchcry:
If it's not TLR [true-local-realism] it's not true local realism!PS: Since TLR delivers the correct [ie, QM validated] results for EPRB, CHSH, GHSZ, GHZ, Mermin's version of GHZ -- with experimental validation via all of Aspect's experiments, etc -- I would welcome the technical content of my essay being discussed in the context of Joy Christian's disproofs of Bell's theorem.
Tks; Gordon
NB: At http://www.sciphysicsforums.com/spfbb1/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=311 I've changed my terminology from CLR (clear local realism) to TLR (true-local-realism).
Thanks to minkwe's fair challenge: I suggest that thread is the place to now discuss the [u]core component of my theory: TLR[/u]:
With its catchcry: [b]If it's not TLR [true-local-realism] it's not true local realism![/b]
PS: Since TLR delivers the correct [ie, QM validated] results for EPRB, CHSH, GHSZ, GHZ, Mermin's version of GHZ -- with experimental validation via all of Aspect's experiments, etc -- I would welcome the technical content of my essay being discussed in the context of Joy Christian's disproofs of Bell's theorem.
Tks; Gordon