Bell’s Theorem Refuted Irrefutably on Bell’s Own Terms

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are OFF
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Bell’s Theorem Refuted Irrefutably on Bell’s Own Terms

Bell’s Theorem Refuted Irrefutably on Bell’s Own Terms

Post by Gordon Watson » Tue Aug 14, 2018 4:34 am

.
Bell’s Theorem Refuted Irrefutably on Bell’s Own Terms. 3-pages. http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0496?ref=10076773

Abstract: Using elementary mathematics, and consistent with claims that we've advanced since 1989, we refute Bell's inequality irrefutably on Bell's own terms. In sum, in Bell 1964: (14b) ≠ (14a).

Yes, I say "irrefutably" because that's the basis of my theory and, more than ever, what I believe.

Critical comments are especially welcome, and on every aspect of the essay. The format arises from my desire to bundle the issues and the arguments very tightly. [I find it helpful.]

Further: every equation and key sentence is numbered to facilitate discussion, correction, improvement, etc.

I expect the essay foreshadowed in the above --- Watson (2018e) --- to be available before month's end.

PS: I would also appreciate pointers to other sites that might provide robust rational discussion on anything to do with Bell's work and his theorem; or where my own arguments might help the cause. Tho I hope to get the best discussion here.

Cheers, for now; Gordon
.

Top

cron
CodeCogs - An Open Source Scientific Library