The Force of Gravity: 2014 Treatment

[muon200]

f is force

f = 13 square meters rMm / ((R^2) sqrt(4ns) kg second^1.5)

This new form is equal to Newton's equation from 330 years ago.

r is proton radius
R is Earth radius
m is a mass
M is Earth mass
ns are 4.4 nanoseconds for a hadron volume to be shrunk
ns are 4.4ns grown by a hadron

This conforms to the Folmsbee-Christian Theory of Gravity. Gravity must be simple for it to work so well in the middle of a star.

"Atoms are shrinking space and growing time. This is gravity".

Alan Folmsbee
December 24, 2014
Merry Christmas Joy!

[muon200]

To confirm the accuracy of the new formula, this shows the work:
using 3.88 nanosecond value instead of 4ns or 4.4 nanoseconds tau. This is a variable to be tuned up to fit proton radius shrink balance.

Issac Newton's force from 1kg mass

f = GM 1kg /R^2
G = 6.6719199 x 10^-11 (meter^3/kg sec^2)
M = 5.9736 x 10^24 kg
R = 6371000 meter
so R^2 = 40589641 meter^2
f = 9.819101557 Newtons of force

sanity check
(6.6 x 5.97 / 40589641) (kg)(meter^3/kg sec^2)kg = 9.7 N

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Alan Folmsbee's force from 1kg mass
f = spacevar x mastime
spacevar = 13.159472 square meters r/R^2
mastime = M 1kg /sqrt(tau) (1/kg sec^1.5)
r = 10^-15 meters
M = 5.9736 x 10^24 kg
tau = 3.88 nanoseconds will be used today, this is a variable for the Conservation of Continuum

spacevar = 13.159472/40589641 = 3.24 meters
mastime = 5.97/sqrt(3.88ns)
mastime = 5.97/1.97 = 3.03 kg/sec^2

f = 3.24 meters x 3.03 kg/sec^2 = 9.8172 Newtons
This matches Newton and Folmsbee force results whan tau is 3.88ns for r = 1 fm

[muon200]

Rigor for exponents is next...

Issac Newton has written 330 years ago...

f is force of gravity

for a 1 kilogram mass find the force

f = GM 1kg /R^2
G = 6.6719199 x 10^-11 (meter^3/kg sec^2)
M = 5.9736 x 10^24 kg
R = 6371000 meter 
so R^2 = 4.0589641 x 10^13 meter^2
f = 9.819101557 Newtons of force for 1kg

sanity check sequence
ignore exponent, get mantissa
(6.6 x 5.97 / 40589641000)
39.8/40 = 9.9

Exponent Accounting Rigor Department
f = GM 1kg /R^2
G = 6.6719199 x 10^-11 (meter^3/kg sec^2)
M = 5.9736 x 10^24 kg
R = 6371000 meter 
so R^2 = 40589641000 meter^2
f = 9.819101557 Newtons of force

f = 6.6719199 x 10^-11 (meter^3/kg sec^2) 5.9736 x 10^24 kg x 1kg /R^2

R^2 = 4.0589641 x 10^13
Exponents -11 +24 - 13 = 0 Good!

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
December 25, 2014 Alan Folmsbee has written

f is the force of gravity.

find the force from a 1 kilogram mass

f = spacevar x mastime

spacevar = 13.159472 square meters r/R^2
mastime = M 1kg /sqrt(tau) (1/kg sec^1.5)

r = 10^-15 meters
R = 6371000 meter 
so R^2 = 4.0589641 x 10^13 meter^2

M = 5.9736 x 10^24 kg
tau = 3.88 nanoseconds will be used today. This is a variable for the Conservation of Continuum for the proton volume.

The Square Root of tau is 1.9697715 sqrt(ns)
or it can be written as
6.2289646e-5 sqrt(seconds)


get mantissas
spacevar = 13.159472/40589641000 = 3.242076469
mastime = 5.9736/sqrt(3.88ns)
mastime = 5.9736/1.9697715 = 3.0326360189

force is 9.8320378 Newtons
This matches Newton and Folmsbee force results as close as you want to adjust tau from 3.88 nanoseconds to a better value.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Begin sanity check sequence and exponent accounting rigor.

spacevar = 13.159472 square meters r/R^2
mastime = M 1kg /sqrt(tau) (1/kg sec^1.5)

find exponents only
spacevar = 1.3159472 x 10^1 x 10^-15/4.0589641 x 10^13 meter^2
1-15-13 = -27

for exponents of mastime use this sqrt(tau) = 6.2289646e-5 ns but use 1.9697715 mantissa

mastime = 5.97 x 10^+24 x 1 x/1.9697715e-5

24 +5 = 29

mind mantissas
spacevar 1.3159472/4.0589641 = .3242076469 x 10^-27
spacevar = 3.242076469 x 10^-28

mastime 5.9736 x 1/1.9697715 = 3.032636

3.032636 x 10^29

mastime = 3.032636 x 10^29

force = 3.032636 x 10^29 x 3.242076469 x 10^-28

force = f = 9.832037 Newtons

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Note The use of tau = 3.88 nanoseconds causes a problem when separately figuring exponents and mantissas.

sqrt(tau) = sqrt(3.88 ns) = sqrt(3.88) x sqrt(ns) = 6x10-5 sqrt(seconds)
more later...