https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid= ... GV4c2lnaWx
Here a sketch of the way op page 5 of the seven pages you see in a way that is too good not to be true that the human brain or the forgotten instrument between the ears is a quantum mechanical based Bayesian weighing computer. So forget psychology and biology it's quantum mechanics.
To grasp the essentials of this some knowledge of the Big Five personality traits is needed in order to appreciate why these five traits are the basic things to be dealt with in the CPU of the brain in order to make us humans tick. The fact that all the "quantum blocks"fit like clockwork has thus not only DNA written all over them yet also the different wave lengths of the different types of human.
Psychologists "forgot"to integrate the data of Big Five, DSM-5 and developmental psychology. That the Big Five traits fit so well to DSM-5 data can't be explained by chance.
Taken this to be correct as a fact shows why all creative people like Einstein / Bach types are given optimum nurture 1/500. Not authority driven and intuitively bad with numbers, yet excell at 3D imagery and rheology mind picturing.
This also shows why the brain needs a chaotic dream state in order to compensate for orderly thought, and that we are shut off in sleep. Ergo the reason is that this is a low energy solution for living beings in order not to boil the brain in order to compensate for the chaos. This in turn supports the underlying idea and concept for a TOE in which not energy and gravity are the fundamental forces of nature but order and chaos in a double dynamic crystal that works like a hologram. This is worked out in a sketch showing on page 10, 11, & 12 of 12 pages the double slit experiment, entanglement and the implications with the brain.
https://sites.google.com/site/simplexsi ... stable-toe
A concept with many testable implications. Also showing in the forgotten instrument between the ears the reason why physicists and scientists in general in majority suffer from an inherent confirmation bias. 80% given the same distribution of the fastest thinkers are not creative yet good with numbers. Relative retards on the instrument between the ears.