What is wrong with this?

Foundations of physics and/or philosophy of physics, and in particular, posts on unresolved or controversial issues

Re: What is wrong with this?

Postby Ben6993 » Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:55 am

Fred wrote:
I suppose the correct way of doing it is to get the action by taking the integral of the Lagrangian then using the principle of stationary action.

Agreed. One 'problem' with the lagrangian is that it contains potentials which are not unique: you can add any constant to a potential and it does not change the result of minimising the action (i.e gauge invariance). That is because one minimises by differentiating, and a constant term always goes to zero on differentiation. So if you are not minimising the action, the lagrangian could give you any answer you wanted by adding an arbitrary constant to the potential. Not sure that your X is a constant, but whatever it is it would need to preserve gauge invariance, and a constant would do that OK.
Ben6993
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:53 pm

Previous

Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 185 guests

cron
CodeCogs - An Open Source Scientific Library