gill1109 wrote: I guess the word of thanks is the closest we are going to get to an acknowledgement by Christian that my criticism of earlier simulation models was justified. I wonder if Fred will also admit that he was wrong, too.
Not from that for sure.
Fred Diether replied on Feb. 24, 2014 @ 00:01 GMT Richard said, "It can be mathematically proven that we *don't* go from Bell's straight line to the cosine curve." in relation to what I said.
OK, go for it. Let's see the rigorous mathematical proof that what I am saying above is false. I would advise you not to waste your time on it since Joy has already extremely mathematically and rigorously proven that it is true here and with this paper here from a different direction.
From the FQXi blog. I am still waiting for you to show your mathematical proof to what I said here.
Fred Diether wrote on Feb. 23, 2014 @ 20:22 GMT In addition to what Joy posted, it is very clear to see what is going on with the Minkwe simulation via John Reed's Mathematica translation. Take a look at the 6 graphs as theta_0 goes from 0 to pi/2 with 5 million trials and 1 degree resolution. We go from Bell's straight line to the cosine curve. Anyone that knows calculus can see that as the number of trials goes to the infinity limit and as the degree resolution goes to the infinitesimal limit, that the perfect cosine curve will be achieved. No doubt this could be mathematically proven should there be an enterprising soul out there. It is easy to see though so not sure if anyone should waste their time on it.
You need to do the EPR Challenge here.
viewtopic.php?f=22&t=22#p448