Einstein was right --- a new anti-Bell book by Karl Hess
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2014 4:55 am
Prof. Karl Hess has written a new book explaining how John Bell managed to pull Einstein’s Trojan horse into the castle of physics, unleashing the forces against the use of probability as a basis for the laws of nature.
He argues that Bell was not aware of the special role that space-time play in any rigorous probability theory. As a result, his formalism is not general enough to be applied to the Aspect–Zeilinger type of experiments, and consequently his conclusions about the existence of instantaneous influences at a distance are not correct.
Readers of this forum may be aware that I too have somewhat similar views, documented, for example, in my latest paper and the accompanying simulation.
In the book Karl also describes his unpleasant past interactions with a certain statistician called Richard Gill. Karl, however, is much too polite to bring out the truly despicable underhand tactics used by the likes of Richard Gill against any dissenters of the Bell ideology. To get a more candid picture of various tactics used you may have to visit my blog and check out the references linked therein. They demand reconceptualization of the enterprise usually called "science." As the physicist and sociologist Brian Martin puts it (again, far too politely), "rather than being solely a search for the truth, science is closely bound up with the exercise of power."
In any case, I recommend Prof. Hess’s new book to all parties interested in investigating the true nature of the physical reality.
Einstein was indeed right!
Joy Christian
He argues that Bell was not aware of the special role that space-time play in any rigorous probability theory. As a result, his formalism is not general enough to be applied to the Aspect–Zeilinger type of experiments, and consequently his conclusions about the existence of instantaneous influences at a distance are not correct.
Readers of this forum may be aware that I too have somewhat similar views, documented, for example, in my latest paper and the accompanying simulation.
In the book Karl also describes his unpleasant past interactions with a certain statistician called Richard Gill. Karl, however, is much too polite to bring out the truly despicable underhand tactics used by the likes of Richard Gill against any dissenters of the Bell ideology. To get a more candid picture of various tactics used you may have to visit my blog and check out the references linked therein. They demand reconceptualization of the enterprise usually called "science." As the physicist and sociologist Brian Martin puts it (again, far too politely), "rather than being solely a search for the truth, science is closely bound up with the exercise of power."
In any case, I recommend Prof. Hess’s new book to all parties interested in investigating the true nature of the physical reality.
Einstein was indeed right!
Joy Christian