minkwe wrote:The flaw in the QRC is the same as the flaw in Gill's version. It has been pointed in various ways by many people but they are simply ignored.
In the simplest of terms: You can not refute that a relationship exists between the head-size and length of snakes in the amazon, if you measure head-size in one set of snakes and length in a completely different disjoint set of snakes. (I'm sure as a statistician, Richard is familiar with Simpson's paradox)
FrediFizzx wrote:Hmm... Well, unlike Gill's version of CHSH that NOTHING can violate, not even QM, the QRC can show violation if there is a connection between the a and b vectors. Do you have Mathematica? I have programmed the QRC with your parameters and the notebook file is here.
I am just trying to find what the exact mathematical flaw might be but I hear what you are saying.
Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations
Users browsing this forum: ahrefs [Bot] and 74 guests