I think it is time to come to a conclusion. The discussions about the experiment, the bet, and the challenge have exposed a stunning and elementary and devastating error in JJC's two experimental papers, yet he hasn't acknowledged his fallibility, let alone posted revisions to the papers. He enthusiastically accepts a bet which is logically impossible to win.
Only slightly simplifying, the man has spent weeks learning to program in R and has published attempt after attempt on internet, and repeatedly announced victory, in a quest logically equivialent to the following:
exhibit two integers p and q, such that p^2 = 2 q^2. You may find p and q by simulation, experiment, or just dream them up out of your head.
Why is it logically equivalent? Because if you can prove that Euclid's theorem is false, while there is also a valid proof that it is true, one has proven a contradiction, and if a contradiction is true, everything is both true and false at the same time. The universe will have to instantly collapse and be replaced by something even more inexplicable. 42.
(Of course we should apply this argument in the opposite direction: if JJC could win his bet then he would have derived a contradiction within elementary number theory, hence everything would be both true and false at the same time, in particular we would have a proof that Euclid's theorem is false as well as a proof that it is true. )
One can only wonder on the solidity of the more abstruse work on division algebras, Hopf fibrations, and all that, when simple recipes for experimentalists are totally bungled and the author still has no idea what was wrong with them.
The technique of the Randi challenge has yet again proven its effectiveness in exposing pseudo-science. Time to close down this topic.