Born correspondence between my model and quantum mechanics
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 2:19 am
***
Fred Diether asked me a question about the precise relationship between my model and quantum mechanics. In his words, what he wanted to know was how does my model "complete quantum mechanics." To understand this fully one has to go back to the original paper by EPR and understand their argument within the context of my model, as I have done in this paper. However, it is also possible to understand this more simply through the following Born correspondence. A useful reference is my very first paper where I proposed the Clifford-algebraic model, but here is the precise mathematical correspondence between my model and quantum mechanics:
where
and
Fred Diether asked me a question about the precise relationship between my model and quantum mechanics. In his words, what he wanted to know was how does my model "complete quantum mechanics." To understand this fully one has to go back to the original paper by EPR and understand their argument within the context of my model, as I have done in this paper. However, it is also possible to understand this more simply through the following Born correspondence. A useful reference is my very first paper where I proposed the Clifford-algebraic model, but here is the precise mathematical correspondence between my model and quantum mechanics:
where
and