Detection efficiencies in Gisin-Gisin x Pearle.

Foundations of physics and/or philosophy of physics, and in particular, posts on unresolved or controversial issues

Re: Detection efficiencies in Gisin-Gisin x Pearle.

Postby FrediFizzx » Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:55 pm

Good physicists know how to properly apply math to Nature. Mathematicians don't necessarily know how to do that in a proper way. I suspect you want to be a mathematical physicist like Baez or even Joy but you aren't. But maybe you could be if you wanted to be.
FrediFizzx
Independent Physics Researcher
 
Posts: 2905
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:12 pm
Location: N. California, USA

Re: Detection efficiencies in Gisin-Gisin x Pearle.

Postby gill1109 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:12 am

FrediFizzx wrote:Good physicists know how to properly apply math to Nature. Mathematicians don't necessarily know how to do that in a proper way. I suspect you want to be a mathematical physicist like Baez or even Joy but you aren't. But maybe you could be if you wanted to be.

Indeed I am not a mathematical physicist. I have a lot of fun being a mathematician and being a statistician, and I have a lot of fun communicating with theoretical physicts, and with experimental physicists. (And also with lawyers, police investigators, biologists, medical doctors, psychologists, journalists, ...).

Science needs many disciplines.
gill1109
Mathematical Statistician
 
Posts: 2812
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:39 pm
Location: Leiden

Previous

Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ahrefs [Bot] and 74 guests

cron
CodeCogs - An Open Source Scientific Library