Re: My Challenge to All Bell-Believers --- Meet it or Beat i
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:50 am
There is a reason no one has bothered with this. The issue of locality has been settled and understood for a long time, and it has especially been clear since the GHZ example was discovered that statistical issues such as whatever you plan to obfuscate with are completely irrelevant. Or, to make your supposed challenge apparently much harder to meet, let's actually take all considerations of probability theory at all out of the discussion. Here's your challenge: Show how to create a local state of three particles such that they will give quantum-mechanically acceptable results *on a single run* no matter which of the four possible relevant experimental configurations is chosen. On a single run. No statistics. No averages.No measuring more than one thing by any of the three experimenters.
You can't do it. The proof is so obvious that anyone can follow it. No averages, so no issues about averages. Put up or shut up.
By the bye, the logic of the conclusion of your paper is this: you think that because you derived an inequality by making a certain manifestly ridiculous assumption you have "proven" that other derivations make the same ridiculous assumption. There is an obvious reason no one finds it necessary to respond.
You can't do it. The proof is so obvious that anyone can follow it. No averages, so no issues about averages. Put up or shut up.
By the bye, the logic of the conclusion of your paper is this: you think that because you derived an inequality by making a certain manifestly ridiculous assumption you have "proven" that other derivations make the same ridiculous assumption. There is an obvious reason no one finds it necessary to respond.