Heinera wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:Hi Folks,
Just so lurkers don't get confused by Heine's nonsense, Bell only said that A(a, lambda) = +/- 1 and B(b, lambda) = +/- 1. That means for a binary valued HV,
A(a, +1) = +/- 1 and B(b, +1) = +/- 1
A(a, -1) = +/- 1 and B(b, -1) = +/- 1
So you are going to still get all 4 outcome possibilities, + +, - -, + -, and - +. What Bell specified has nothing to do with the 4 outcome possibilities. The outcomes also depend on a and b not just lambda.
.
I specified that for a fixed pair of detector settings, you can only get two combinations of outcomes with a binary HV. For different settings, the two combinations can of course also be different. But this anyway contradicts the QM predictions, where you will observe all four possible combinations for almost any fixed pair of detector settings. (Exceptions are exactly opposite settings, or equal settings.)
It's as simple as this: When you flip a coin, there are only two possible outcomes. Not four.
Sorry, even holding the detector settings fixed does not work. If lambda = + 1 and say on the first run you get +1 for the outcome. On the second run even keeping the detector at the same setting you could get a -1 for the outcome with lambda still +1. So please stop posting nonsense about this. The following holds true.
A(a, +1) = +/- 1 and B(b, +1) = +/- 1
A(a, -1) = +/- 1 and B(b, -1) = +/- 1
All four outcome possibilities happen even with a binary HV.
.