gill1109 wrote:Joy Christian wrote:Heinera wrote:
The reason I brought up Bell's (9) is that in (10) he shows that this approach won't reproduce the quantum correlations. Peres elaborates a bit on this.
Does Bell or Peres pay any attention to the geometry and topology of the physical space in which we are confined to perform all our experiments?
No, they don't.
Therefore their claims have little or no physical value.
***
Bell and Peres and others explain very clearly why the geometry and topology of the physical space in which we are confined to perform our experiments play no role whatsoever. Because Bell's argument relies only on basic notations of causality, which themselves only use the most basic features of our understanding of space and time.
Sorry, but both Bell and Peres made mistakes. They didn't use Joy's hidden variable.
.