FrediFizzx wrote:Heinera wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:That is not what the polarizer simulation says. Now, we have a spin vector for the original singlet that can point in any 3D direction. We call it s.
The only time that you will get AB = -1 always is when s = a = b or -s = a = b.
.
I don't care what the polarizer simulation says. QM predicts that the correlation is -1 when the two detector settings are equal. That is, -cos(0).
Hmm... there is something wrong with that prediction then as it seems to be contrary to experiment. Ok, let me take another look at the polarizer simulation.
.
You are right. The prediction is good. I missed in the polarizer simulation that the +/- on a and b in the limits are linked. So we need a refinement for the measurement functions.
Where
.