0.017949549,0.017949549
-0.0938793443,-0.0938793443
-0.789596145,-0.789596145
0.922477832,0.922477832
-0.322036654,-0.322036654
0.395230537,0.395230537
0.757630627,0.757630627
-0.640295221,-0.640295221
-0.327395507,-0.327395507
0.300092385,0.300092385
-0.209833365,-0.209833365
0.70517569,0.70517569
-0.764990807,-0.764990807
-0.474730157,-0.474730157
-0.868153599,-0.868153599
-0.869267941,-0.869267941
-0.602666268,-0.602666268
-0.322720546,-0.322720546
0.0232923634,0.0232923634
0.875370634,0.875370634
0.723617988,0.723617988
0.934730789,0.934730789
-0.331005444,-0.331005444
-0.379023637,-0.379023637
-0.792449733,-0.792449733
-0.441063469,-0.441063469
0.108057849,0.108057849
-0.256954126,-0.256954126
0.627745488,0.627745488
-0.294752727,-0.294752727
-0.398463393,-0.398463393
-0.185674157,-0.185674157
-0.825926328,-0.825926328
0.550036913,0.550036913
0.698602655,0.698602655
-0.992675411,-0.992675411
0.0975430222,0.0975430222
0.790740101,0.790740101
-0.763338655,-0.763338655
0.207484344,0.207484344
0.629799273,0.629799273
0.391404568,0.391404568
-0.0685358598,-0.0685358598
-0.771001405,-0.771001405
0.834117616,0.834117616
-0.995934318,-0.995934318
0.119162173,0.119162173
-0.257385749,-0.257385749
-0.377966588,-0.377966588
-0.192731443,-0.192731443
0.65459252,0.65459252
0.803735122,0.803735122
0.259108379,0.259108379
0.719862624,0.719862624
0.596531103,0.596531103
-0.433634313,-0.433634313
-0.643214111,-0.643214111
0.488317607,0.488317607
0.511413062,0.511413062
-0.663298959,-0.663298959
0.00692383577,0.00692383577
0.365534934,0.365534934
-0.0776455309,-0.0776455309
0.405618687,0.405618687
-0.346737972,-0.346737972
0.0713019485,0.0713019485
-0.723454809,-0.723454809
0.751693929,0.751693929
-0.499445488,-0.499445488
-0.21352609,-0.21352609
-0.785223159,-0.785223159
0.574765814,0.574765814
0.626914433,0.626914433
0.427915922,0.427915922
0.391288536,0.391288536
-0.473157665,-0.473157665
0.307498883,0.307498883
0.663627824,0.663627824
-0.160323667,-0.160323667
-0.0908786081,-0.0908786081
-0.944245989,-0.944245989
0.795248871,0.795248871
-0.766409105,-0.766409105
0.887035994,0.887035994
0.835185484,0.835185484
-0.444994419,-0.444994419
-0.0743864029,-0.0743864029
0.176077951,0.176077951
0.98978712,0.98978712
-0.187589697,-0.187589697
-0.16518859,-0.16518859
0.673625877,0.673625877
-0.864551724,-0.864551724
-0.585735659,-0.585735659
0.374909262,0.374909262
-0.239559603,-0.239559603
-0.811515798,-0.811515798
-0.167552397,-0.167552397
-0.274433247,-0.274433247
0.0548776858,0.0548776858
-0.441253908,-0.441253908
0.731850946,0.731850946
-0.20050776,-0.20050776
-0.141226352,-0.141226352
0.462598928,0.462598928
-0.70000302,-0.70000302
-0.0976652,-0.0976652
-0.756053038,-0.756053038
0.952066912,0.952066912
-0.428566922,-0.428566922
0.132003068,0.132003068
0.286085275,0.286085275
-0.354791548,-0.354791548
-0.0400083341,-0.0400083341
0.166708562,0.166708562
0.686989706,0.686989706
-0.881401398,-0.881401398
0.861895095,0.861895095
0.750834892,0.750834892
0.384457025,0.384457025
-0.326053825,-0.326053825
-0.736869687,-0.736869687
-0.0322222404,-0.0322222404
0.670766959,0.670766959
-0.00721312412,-0.00721312412
-0.599191891,-0.599191891
0.700372963,0.700372963
-0.643265624,-0.643265624
-0.178860902,-0.178860902
0.278945755,0.278945755
0.314571006,0.314571006
-0.0386327407,-0.0386327407
-0.491505303,-0.491505303
0.497310796,0.497310796
0.851954894,0.851954894
0.94284716,0.94284716
0.614649227,0.614649227
0.221957956,0.221957956
-0.519308438,-0.519308438
-0.643143314,-0.643143314
-0.590759742,-0.590759742
0.281922788,0.281922788
0.659773504,0.659773504
0.941360026,0.941360026
0.185575738,0.185575738
-0.561635376,-0.561635376
0.573138888,0.573138888
-0.697103988,-0.697103988
0.228181539,0.228181539
0.244474401,0.244474401
0.308398048,0.308398048
-0.754627216,-0.754627216
0.110541838,0.110541838
0.217793894,0.217793894
0.545836733,0.545836733
FrediFizzx wrote:I also did a check on the A and B +/-1 data. Out of 10,000 trials I get,
++ = 2517
+- = 2497
-+ = 2515
-- = 2471
total = 10,000
That is pretty close to the QM prediction of 25 percent for each one. I'm sure it gets even better for more trials.
.
Heinera wrote:I assume he has just just used many different angles and accumulated, so these numbers are averages. Of course a lot of things will generate these numbers, not only the QM correlations (for example, random coin tosses on both sides). It would be more interesting if he could post the distribution for just a specific set of angles, e.g. a=0 and b=22.5 (degrees).
Heinera wrote:Do you mean that A and B are random in your simulation?
FrediFizzx wrote:Heinera wrote:Do you mean that A and B are random in your simulation?
Of course A and B are random +/-1 because a, b and s are all random.
.
Heinera wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:Heinera wrote:Do you mean that A and B are random in your simulation?
Of course A and B are random +/-1 because a, b and s are all random.
.
So I thought. Can you run your simulation again with A and B set to two specific values, A = 0 and B = 22.5 (degrees), if it's not too much effort? Just curious.
FrediFizzx wrote:I suppose you mean the vectors a = 0 and b = 22.5 degrees. A and B are the +/-1 outputs. I might try to play around with fixed vectors. But what is it you want to see with those settings?
.
Heinera wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:I suppose you mean the vectors a = 0 and b = 22.5 degrees. A and B are the +/-1 outputs. I might try to play around with fixed vectors. But what is it you want to see with those settings?
.
Yes, that's what I meant.
What I want to see with those settings is the same as you posted for the random settings, i.e. the numbers for the four combinations.
FrediFizzx wrote:OK, got it. Now, I suppose those angles are going to be in the x-y plane if z is the propagation axis? The distribution of ++, etc. is not going to change because s is still random.
.
Heinera wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:OK, got it. Now, I suppose those angles are going to be in the x-y plane if z is the propagation axis? The distribution of ++, etc. is not going to change because s is still random.
.
Yes about the x-y plane.
If the distribution is not going to change then your model is completely at odds with QM. Se the post by Joy above.
FrediFizzx wrote:Heinera wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:OK, got it. Now, I suppose those angles are going to be in the x-y plane if z is the propagation axis? The distribution of ++, etc. is not going to change because s is still random.
.
Yes about the x-y plane.
If the distribution is not going to change then your model is completely at odds with QM. Se the post by Joy above.
Ok, so you finally cough up what you really want to see. Yeah, the distribution will change. It will take me a while to get this figured out. a = 0 is no good because that locks a.s to 0.
Joy Christian wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:Heinera wrote:
Yes about the x-y plane.
If the distribution is not going to change then your model is completely at odds with QM. Se the post by Joy above.
Ok, so you finally cough up what you really want to see. Yeah, the distribution will change. It will take me a while to get this figured out. a = 0 is no good because that locks a.s to 0.
a = 22.5 degrees and b = 45.0 degrees will give the same probabilities.
***
Heinera wrote:Cos and sin will give you the coordinates.
FrediFizzx wrote:So what are the probabilities for 22.5 degrees?
.
Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 199 guests