FrediFizzx wrote:Off-topic. We are doing local QM here. Not Joy's classical model.
.
I would have liked to respond to Fred, but with the danger of being judged off-topic, as follows:
when you say local QM, do you mean Joy's GA calculations with quaternions, bivectors, and all that? I agree that in principle you should be able to implement them by any computer package that can work with the Pauli matrices. And that seems to be exactly what you have done (in Mathematica). I like it! I can see that it is correct and therefore, of course, it gets the right answer.
So, on a new thread, I ask the questions: what is local QM, what is Joy's classical model, and what is the relation between the two?
AFAIK, Joy has asserted that he only has *one* model. The one in the RSOS paper is some kind of generalisation of everything he did before, right? Please correct me if I am wrong!