local wrote:As far as I can see, the Christian model basically relies upon data rejection ("detection loophole") but justifies the rejection by claiming that the rejected detections correspond to "states" that cannot occur in 3-sphere topology. So my questions are:
1. Is it asserted that the world itself has 3-sphere topology, or just that emitted photon pairs have 3-sphere topology?
2. What are these "states" referred to when models are labeled as (for example) "complete states", etc. Quantum mechanics has only the singlet state for EPRB (leaving aside nonmaximal states).
3. Has it been shown that this 3-sphere topology leads to nonexistence of just those "states" whose rejection produces the quantum correlation? Where is this demonstration given in a form digestible by mere humans?
Thank you for any light you can shed on these questions!
The Christian model does NOT rely on data rejection if the states don't exist in the first place!
1. We are mainly talking about EPR-Bohm so it is fermions with spin 1/2 not photons.
2. We don't understand the question.
3. The simulations speak for themselves. How else could Nature do the quantum correlations without "spooky action at a distance" which is complete nonsense? This is how. Action in Nature is local.
.