Karma Peny Simulation Appears to Violate Bell
Posted: Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:48 pm
After much effort the simulation at https://codeserver.net/bell/2/ now appears to violate Bell's in-equalities using CHSH experiment.
Math is based on Karma Peny's presentation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOtsEgbg1-s
Modes are:
Quantum (simulated 'spooky action at a distance', random 50% detection)
Classic (local hidden variables, cos²(θ) probability match, |cos(2θ)| probability detection)
Karma Peny (local hidden variables, cos²(θ) simple match, |cos(2θ)| probability)
The Quantum mode is nothing special (particles communicate), and achieves an almost perfect 2.8 CHSH score.
But the other 2 modes Classic and Karma Peny are special, the particles have "local hidden variables" that do not communicate (each detection knows only properties of 1 particle and 1 detector).
The Classic Model exceeds QM expected values at approximately 2.5.
The Karma Peny model actually far exceeds the QM expected 2.8 with values in the 3+ range.
Simulation at https://codeserver.net/bell/2
Code is available at https://github.com/tankersley/bell
Math is based on Karma Peny's presentation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yOtsEgbg1-s
Modes are:
Quantum (simulated 'spooky action at a distance', random 50% detection)
Classic (local hidden variables, cos²(θ) probability match, |cos(2θ)| probability detection)
Karma Peny (local hidden variables, cos²(θ) simple match, |cos(2θ)| probability)
The Quantum mode is nothing special (particles communicate), and achieves an almost perfect 2.8 CHSH score.
But the other 2 modes Classic and Karma Peny are special, the particles have "local hidden variables" that do not communicate (each detection knows only properties of 1 particle and 1 detector).
The Classic Model exceeds QM expected values at approximately 2.5.
The Karma Peny model actually far exceeds the QM expected 2.8 with values in the 3+ range.
Simulation at https://codeserver.net/bell/2
Code is available at https://github.com/tankersley/bell