I belatedly heard that Boris Tsirelson has passed away (it was two months ago). Maybe we should discuss his theorem (you could call it: the quantum CHSH inequality)
https://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2020/04/ ... -tsirelson
gill1109 wrote:I belatedly heard that Boris Tsirelson has passed away (it was two months ago). Maybe we should discuss his theorem (you could call it: the quantum CHSH inequality)
https://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2020/04/ ... -tsirelson
gill1109 wrote:
I belatedly heard that Boris Tsirelson has passed away (it was two months ago). Maybe we should discuss his theorem (you could call it: the quantum CHSH inequality)
https://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2020/04/ ... -tsirelson
FrediFizzx wrote:gill1109 wrote:I belatedly heard that Boris Tsirelson has passed away (it was two months ago). Maybe we should discuss his theorem (you could call it: the quantum CHSH inequality)
https://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2020/04/ ... -tsirelson
It's easy perhaps.
Is it the only way of getting the maximum bound?
gill1109 wrote:I
You may ask yourself: what does this have to do with Warsaw?
gill1109 wrote:
I gave a Zoom talk in Krakow (well ... I was in Apeldoorn, Netherlands) with somehow Boris' spirit very much in my mind. There will be a second talk next Monday. The slides are here:
https://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~gill/Warsaw.pdf
https://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~gill/Warsaw2.pdf
Joy Christian wrote:Nice slides, but you are wasting your time. Bell's theorem has no scientific merit. It is simply a politically and sociologically sustained belief system. You don't have to keep up the facade.
Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations
Users browsing this forum: ahrefs [Bot] and 73 guests