gill1109 wrote:Joy Christian wrote:Pure nonsense again. I don't care about John the Biased or any other online bullies you want to recruit to your unhealthy obsession with me. You are a complete ignoramus who knows nothing about the subject of algebra. I have refuted your argument hundreds of times on the RSOS thread of my paper since 2018, and most recently on the following PubPeer thread:https://pubpeer.com/publications/E3CC09191C99B14164303D5CAEE98D#4. The algebra in my RSOS and "octonion-like" papers does not conflict with either Hurwitz's theorem or Frobenius' theorem. But you, like John the Biased, are too ignorant to understand that. Alternatively, you can find a mistake in the calculation in my paper and prove me wrong. But you are too algebraically challenged to be able to do that. And no mathematician in the world has found a mistake in my calculation because there is none. This fact needs to go through your thick skull. The algebra in my paper is a normed division algebra whether you like it or not.
Sorry to get you so upset. Honestly, *you* don't seem interested to find the mistake which you apparently claim is present in existing proofs by famous mathematicians of a famous theorem in pure mathematics. So I doubt that any serious mathematician in the world is interested to find a mistake in your proof for you. And I'm just a statistician, so my opinion counts for nothing, so why should I take the trouble to look? But I will take a look again, next time you get this paper published. I trust you'll let us know on this forum when that happens.
Where did I claim there is a mistake in the existing proofs? Your claim again shows that you do not know what you are talking about.
***