minkwe wrote:Another point Jaynes makes is: According to QM
for all
ie, knowledge of the setting for the A measurement does not change any predictions at B. Yet simultaneously, according to QM
Why do you think . Do you think this is due to non-locality or any spooky reason? If you do, then you've misunderstood even more of what Jaynes is saying in which case I would ask you to again describe step-by-step how you would calculate/estimate from the same experimental data above obtained from your distributed computing experiment. And please be careful to explain why you would use a different procedure to calculate from the one used to calculate .
It is perfectly unsurprising that . What goes on at the two detectors is influenced by what happened at the source. Given a and b, B helps us predict A.
I estimate P(B|Aab) by #ABab/#Aab and P(B|a) by #Ba/#a, how would you do it?