viewtopic.php?f=6&t=457&p=12071#p12069
To keep that thread on topic I respond here.
gill1109 wrote: I don't find any of the four experiments of 2015 (Delft, Munich, Vienna, NIST) "convincing" as "experimental disproof of local realism".
And there you have it guys! All the experiments are either debunked or unconvincing. One wouldn't have guessed that from Richard's repeated touting of these experiments. He certainly did so in an attempt to refute Graft's local realistic analysis and elsewhere in the forum.
I appreciate your honesty, Richard. I don't care how innovative a piece of nonsense is, but we are all entitled to our own tastes. I guess that Nobel prize is still just a dream.
One last thing. If you ever do find an experiment that is not easily debunked and is convincing to you, Graft and I will be happy to analyze it, provided that the full raw data is available (not postselected or processed in any way). Consider the request for such an experiment to be the 'Experimental Randi Challenge (ERC)'.