FrediFizzx wrote:gill1109 wrote:I know a theorem from machine learning and AI (a distributed computing no-go theorem) which tells me not to try...
Suit yourself. I have given all the info necessary for anyone to do a sim on a different program.
a = RandomInteger[{1, 360}]; Random angle in one degree increments
b = RandomInteger[{1, 360}];
A = -Sign[Cos[a Degree]];
B = Sign[Cos[b Degree]];
If QM could do event by event outcome prediction is this perhaps the prediction it would give?
Fred, your model says that the outcomes A and B at detectors 1 and 2 are completely separate, deterministic, functions of the settings given to each detector. The expectation of the product of the outcomes, i.e., the thing which physicsts call the correlation, is -sign(cos(alpha)) * sign(cos(beta)), where I have represented the settings as angles measured in radians. The correlation can only be -1 or +1 and it depends on alpha - beta. It is not difficult to figure out what it is! No point in doing a simulation.