gill1109 wrote:
Here's a revision of my paper Comment on “Dr. Bertlmann’s Socks in a Quaternionic World of Ambidextral Reality” https://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~gill/IEEE_Access_paper-rev2.pdf. It should also be on arXiv tomorrow morning https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.11338.
gill1109 wrote:
Obviously I will never convince Joy Christian that he is wrong but it seems I did convince quite a few others.
Joy Christian wrote:[quote="gill1109"
Obviously I will never convince Joy Christian that he is wrong but it seems I did convince quite a few others.
FrediFizzx wrote:@gill1109 Good! Now maybe you will learn some proper geometric algebra.
gill1109 wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:@gill1109 Good! Now maybe you will learn some proper geometric algebra.
Learn something new every day.
I am trying to rebuild GAViewer. The source code is available but standard rebuilding does not seem to work on MacOS or Ubuntu Linux. It needs some pretty ancient libraries which clash with presently used ones.
gill1109 wrote:Meantime, I have been talking to the guys behind GAViewer. They don't have the resources to keep it updated. They tell me that the future maybe lies with ganja: https://github.com/enkimute/ganja.js ...
FrediFizzx wrote:gill1109 wrote:Meantime, I have been talking to the guys behind GAViewer. They don't have the resources to keep it updated. They tell me that the future maybe lies with ganja: https://github.com/enkimute/ganja.js ...
Looks pretty nerdy. Try progamming one of the GAViewer scripts in it. Let's see how you do. It needs to compile data in a list and export to a file or it is useless.
FrediFizzx wrote:@gill1109 Same old junk physics and math, and lies; different day.
## This version has been adapted from Richard Gill's optimized version of
## Michel Fodje's original simulation of the model, which can be found here:
## http://rpubs.com/gill1109/EPRB3opt. Later Richard Gill improved his 3D
## version by employing the exact probability distribution derived by Philip
## Pearle in his classic 1970 paper: http://rpubs.com/gill1109/Pearle. It
## should be noted, however, that, unlike Pearle's model, the 3-sphere model
## has nothing whatsoever to do with data rejection or detection loophole.
## All of the above simulations are inspired by the original simulation of
## the 3-sphere model by Chantal Roth, https://github.com/chenopodium/JCS2.
FrediFizzx wrote:@gill1109 More lies and nonsense. You're doomed to bending the truth. Nobody cares about what happened 7 years ago. Get over it.
.
gill1109 wrote:
Yesterday I got the expected request to referee Christian's "reply" to my "comment" on Joy Christian's second IEEE Access paper. My report has now been submitted. My "comment" on the first IEEE Access paper is being reviewed. I hope to get news from RSOS coming week.
Joy Christian wrote:gill1109 wrote:
Yesterday I got the expected request to referee Christian's "reply" to my "comment" on Joy Christian's second IEEE Access paper. My report has now been submitted. My "comment" on the first IEEE Access paper is being reviewed. I hope to get news from RSOS coming week.
I have posted my "reply" on Academia.Edu and ResearchGate:
https://www.academia.edu/45322288/Reply ... l_Reality_
https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... l_Reality'
I have not posted my "reply" on the arXiv yet as it will have to go through revisions in light of the reviewer comments and editorial suggestions, and that may take a while.
.
Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests