Joy Christian wrote:.
All criticisms of my 3-sphere model for the singlet correlations, without exception, either by Gill or by anyone else, are of the following "logical" form:
Say, my 3-sphere model is X. It is portrayed by the critics as Y, which is a strawman of X. The model Y is then criticized, or sometimes even ridiculed. It is then triumphantly declared by the critics that they have thereby criticized my model X and thus refuted my claim of reproducing the singlet correlations in a manifestly local-realistic model.
One can argue about the fine details of my model or of its criticisms until the cows come home. But, at the end of the day, above is the "logic" that is followed by the critics. This logic is then enthusiastically endorsed by all Bell-believers and lamented by the Bell-sceptics, whether publicly or in the secrecy of the editorial offices of predatory and non-predatory journals.
.
Heinera wrote:
No, that's not my criticism.
Joy Christian wrote:Heinera wrote:
No, that's not my criticism.
I am not interested in your "criticism" even if you have one. I am only concerned about those critics who have professional standing and influence in academia.
.
Heinera wrote:Joy Christian wrote:Heinera wrote:
No, that's not my criticism.
I am not interested in your "criticism" even if you have one. I am only concerned about those critics who have professional standing and influence in academia.
.
Well, there are only a couple of those, since the rest couldn't be botherd to criticize someone without professional standing or influence in academia.
Joy Christian wrote:And you have to have papers published on your name before they can even have a chance of having retracted by a stalker or a sociopath.
.
Heinera wrote:Joy Christian wrote:And you have to have papers published on your name before they can even have a chance of having retracted by a stalker or a sociopath.
.
Without in any way insinuating that distances between the apple and the three may vary, I wish to declare my wholehearted support to the theory that papers have to be published before they can even have a chance to be retracted.
gill1109 wrote:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9380450
Joy Christian wrote:
Richard D. Gill will be remembered as Martin Horky of the 3-sphere model of quantum correlations: https://brunelleschi.imss.fi.it/itinera ... Horky.html.
Martin Horky wrote:
Galileo Galilei, the mathematician of Padua , came to us in Bologna and he brought with him that spyglass through which he sees four fictitious planets. On the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth of April I never slept, day and night, but tested that instrument of Galileo's in innumerable ways, in these lower as well as the higher [realms]. On Earth it works miracles; in the heavens it deceives, for other fixed stars appear double. Thus, the following evening I observed with Galileo's spyglass the little star that is seen above the middle one of the three in the tail of the Great Bear, and I saw four very small stars nearby, just as Galileo observed about Jupiter. I have as witnesses most excellent men and most noble doctors, Antonio Roffeni, the most learned mathematician of the University of Bologna , and many others, who with me in a house observed the heavens on the same night of 25 April, with Galileo himself present. But all acknowledged that the instrument deceived. And Galileo became silent, and on the twenty-sixth, a Monday, dejected, he took his leave from Mr. Magini very early in the morning. And he gave no thanks for the favors and the many thoughts, because, full of himself, he hawked a fable. Mr. Magini provided Galileo with distinguished company, both splendid and delightful. Thus the wretched Galileo left Bologna with his spyglass on the twenty-sixth.
gill1109 wrote:
I just received the request from "Entropy" to "sanitize" my paper in that journal discussing many of Joy's works. Have already carried out the required corrections, as well as fixing my own math mistake. Will post the corrected version on arXiv asap.
Joy Christian wrote:gill1109 wrote:
I just received the request from "Entropy" to "sanitize" my paper in that journal discussing many of Joy's works. Have already carried out the required corrections, as well as fixing my own math mistake. Will post the corrected version on arXiv asap.
Sanitized Martin Horky. Sure. After all, this is 2021, not 1610.
At least Martin Horky directly, albeit also maliciously, attacked Galileo's work and paid a heavy price for it.
What Gill has been publishing, on the other hand, has nothing to do with my 3-sphere model at all. Gill is only creating and attacking his own fantasies.
.
FrediFizzx wrote:@gill1109 The best way to "sanitize" your paper is to throw it in the trash can where it actually belongs.
Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests