A Mathematician's Refutation of Bell's Theorem

Foundations of physics and/or philosophy of physics, and in particular, posts on unresolved or controversial issues

Re: A Mathematician's Refutation of Bell's Theorem

Postby Joy Christian » Mon Oct 18, 2021 9:24 am

gill1109 wrote:
Joy Christian wrote:Then those who reviewed your papers must be idiots. :lol:

Many of them are definitely the same as those who reviewed yours. 8-)

My latest IEEE Access paper, which is now published, was reviewed by you. :lol: :lol:
.
Joy Christian
Research Physicist
 
Posts: 2793
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:49 am
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: A Mathematician's Refutation of Bell's Theorem

Postby gill1109 » Mon Oct 18, 2021 11:13 pm

Joy Christian wrote:
gill1109 wrote:
Joy Christian wrote:Then those who reviewed your papers must be idiots. :lol:

Many of them are definitely the same as those who reviewed yours. 8-)

My latest IEEE Access paper, which is now published, was reviewed by you. :lol: :lol:

Good one! 8-) :lol:

We can agree that some reviewers are idiots.
gill1109
Mathematical Statistician
 
Posts: 2812
Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:39 pm
Location: Leiden

Re: A Mathematician's Refutation of Bell's Theorem

Postby FrediFizzx » Wed Oct 20, 2021 11:29 pm

The Bell inequalities are meaningless no matter which way you try to understand them. It is because of ONE simple fact that you Bell fanatics can't seem to wrap your mind around. NOTHING can exceed the bound on the inequalities!!!!!!!!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
.
FrediFizzx
Independent Physics Researcher
 
Posts: 2905
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:12 pm
Location: N. California, USA

Previous

Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ahrefs [Bot] and 11 guests

cron
CodeCogs - An Open Source Scientific Library