A Mathematician's Refutation of Bell's Theorem
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2021 5:29 am
.
We do not need any more refutations of Bell's theorem in this forum. Some of us are convinced already that it is a worthless piece of junk. I myself have provided both counterexamples to it and also formal refutations of it, in my own way. See, for example, my recent talk summarising my work of the past fourteen years: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21753.39529.
However, Bell's theorem continues to dominate the mainstream as well as the semi-popular opinion. A certain statistician, in particular, has doggedly hounded me personally as well as my work, claiming that mathematically Bell's theorem is not refutable. While there is some truth in this claim, in this thread I want to promote a mathematician's refutation of Bell's theorem.
The mathematician is called Frank Lad. He is a Senior Lecturer in Mathematical Statistics, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
While I have yet to read his papers, I have read their abstracts and found them interesting:
1) Quantum Violation of Bell’s Inequality: A Misunderstanding Based on a Mathematical Error of Neglect, Journal of Modern Physics, 2021, 12, 1109-1144,
https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.128067.
2) Quantum Mysteries for No One, Journal of Modern Physics, 2021, 12, 1366-1399,
https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.129082.
Let me know what you think of them if you have a chance to read them. I will do the same if I get a chance to read them.
.
We do not need any more refutations of Bell's theorem in this forum. Some of us are convinced already that it is a worthless piece of junk. I myself have provided both counterexamples to it and also formal refutations of it, in my own way. See, for example, my recent talk summarising my work of the past fourteen years: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21753.39529.
However, Bell's theorem continues to dominate the mainstream as well as the semi-popular opinion. A certain statistician, in particular, has doggedly hounded me personally as well as my work, claiming that mathematically Bell's theorem is not refutable. While there is some truth in this claim, in this thread I want to promote a mathematician's refutation of Bell's theorem.
The mathematician is called Frank Lad. He is a Senior Lecturer in Mathematical Statistics, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
While I have yet to read his papers, I have read their abstracts and found them interesting:
1) Quantum Violation of Bell’s Inequality: A Misunderstanding Based on a Mathematical Error of Neglect, Journal of Modern Physics, 2021, 12, 1109-1144,
https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.128067.
2) Quantum Mysteries for No One, Journal of Modern Physics, 2021, 12, 1366-1399,
https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.129082.
Let me know what you think of them if you have a chance to read them. I will do the same if I get a chance to read them.
.