Page 4 of 4

Re: A Mathematician's Refutation of Bell's Theorem

PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2021 9:24 am
by Joy Christian
gill1109 wrote:
Joy Christian wrote:Then those who reviewed your papers must be idiots. :lol:

Many of them are definitely the same as those who reviewed yours. 8-)

My latest IEEE Access paper, which is now published, was reviewed by you. :lol: :lol:
.

Re: A Mathematician's Refutation of Bell's Theorem

PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2021 11:13 pm
by gill1109
Joy Christian wrote:
gill1109 wrote:
Joy Christian wrote:Then those who reviewed your papers must be idiots. :lol:

Many of them are definitely the same as those who reviewed yours. 8-)

My latest IEEE Access paper, which is now published, was reviewed by you. :lol: :lol:

Good one! 8-) :lol:

We can agree that some reviewers are idiots.

Re: A Mathematician's Refutation of Bell's Theorem

PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2021 11:29 pm
by FrediFizzx
The Bell inequalities are meaningless no matter which way you try to understand them. It is because of ONE simple fact that you Bell fanatics can't seem to wrap your mind around. NOTHING can exceed the bound on the inequalities!!!!!!!!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
.