jreed wrote:Why would anyone be interested in your simulations? These latest ones are all based on the detection loophole and when that is pointed out to you, you just reply with the same strawman comment. This is all just a waste of time.
local wrote:Heinera wrote:@FrediFizzx, is there a way to delete my account on this forum? I see no such option in the User Control Panel.
The roaches scatter when the light shines on them.
local wrote:The kitchen was too hot for Heine.
FrediFizzx wrote:No more post are allowed here unless they are legitimate questions, comments or attempts to take down the latest simulation without strawman models.
.
jreed wrote: ... What are we not allowed to do? Please define what a strawman model is.
FrediFizzx wrote:jreed wrote: ... What are we not allowed to do? Please define what a strawman model is.
Jeez! you are not allowed to change the code!
.
FrediFizzx wrote:jreed wrote: ... What are we not allowed to do? Please define what a strawman model is.
Jeez! you are not allowed to change the code!
gill1109 wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:jreed wrote: ... What are we not allowed to do? Please define what a strawman model is.
Jeez! you are not allowed to change the code!
But we are allowed to criticise it? (Not that I have any new criticisms beyond the ones I already wrote about).
gill1109 wrote:(Not that I have any new criticisms beyond the ones I already wrote about).
jreed wrote:FrediFizzx wrote:jreed wrote: ... What are we not allowed to do? Please define what a strawman model is.
Jeez! you are not allowed to change the code!
.
That's great Fred! We can't change the code. What are we allowed to do?
Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests