minkwe wrote:I do not see any direct response here to the mathematical arguments I made against your paper.
Your arguments are irrelevant. You are not talking about the same things that we are talking about.
minkwe wrote:How can an intersection of 4 disjoint sets not be null?
The four sets *defined in our paper* have a non-null intersection. We assume local realism (local hidden variables). You agree that your model is a local hidden variables model, and allows complete freedom to choose settings (and setting switches) at the will of the experimenters?
minkwe wrote:Secondly if you read my README file you will notice the warning that the particles are not necessarily in pairs only being paired 99.9% of the time.
It should not be difficult for you to fix that defect of your program. Please add in the output lists also identification of the "lost" particles. I am talking about a simulation with 100% detection. "New clocked EPR Simulation with 100% detection." [added later: I fixed this defect myself. I do have truly 100% detection].
minkwe wrote:Thirdly, you are using the same source file each time with a different setting, which is equivalent to measuring the same particle more than once. I have already explained to you previously that this is a meaningless exercise which can never be measured in any doable experiment.
But it is possible to do this with your programs on my computer. It turns out to be a meaningful exercise, because it leads to an interesting deduction.
minkwe wrote:In any case, if this is what your paper is all about, then it confirms my claim that you are talking about impossible experiments.
I did real experiments on your programs on my computer. And you could have done them too. We are not talking about impossible experiments.
Jan-Ake and I proved theorems about the limitations of your programs, through the device of a Gedanken Experiment. Are you saying that Einstein Podolsky and Rosen were fools, for writing a paper about a Gedanken Experiment?
The experimental results which you and I have obtained with your programs confirm our predictions.