A limerick on Bell’s theorem:

Foundations of physics and/or philosophy of physics, and in particular, posts on unresolved or controversial issues

A limerick on Bell’s theorem:

Postby Joy Christian » Fri Feb 08, 2019 11:26 pm

***

The farcical theorem of Bell

drove many good men inane

but Christian with full of Joy

disproved it without any pain.


https://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.1879.pdf

Joy Christian

***
Joy Christian
Research Physicist
 
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:49 am
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: A limerick on Bell’s theorem:

Postby Joy Christian » Sat Mar 16, 2019 1:25 am

Image
Joy Christian
Research Physicist
 
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:49 am
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom

Re: A limerick on Bell’s theorem:

Postby Joy Christian » Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:52 pm

***
The phrase "passion-at-a-distance" was coined by my late Ph.D. advisor Abner Shimony, to describe what is usually known as a "no-signaling non-locality" of orthodox quantum mechanics.

It is not physical, because one cannot send a signal with it, and thus it does not violate special relativistic locality. The concept of "no-signaling non-locality" can be understood also as a violation of "outcome independence" in EPR-Bohm type correlation experiments, according to orthodox Bell dogma, which does not violate special relativistic locality. On the other hand, according to orthodox Bell dogma, "parameter independence" is preserved in such experiments, thus preserving the compatibility of quantum mechanics with special relativistic locality.

However, "passion-at-a-distance" simply does not exist, because a perfectly local and realistic explanation of the quantum correlations does exist: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.2355.pdf.

***
Joy Christian
Research Physicist
 
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:49 am
Location: Oxford, United Kingdom


Return to Sci.Physics.Foundations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ahrefs [Bot] and 5 guests

cron
CodeCogs - An Open Source Scientific Library